Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: What do you know about audit failure so far?
Authors: Rahman, Md. J. 
Ying, Yuhan 
Zhu, Linjie 
Ji, Pengju 
Issue Date: 2020
Publisher: Association for Accountancy & Business Affairs (AABA)
Source: Rahman, J. M., Ying, Y., Zhu, L., & Ji, P. (2020). What do we know about audit failure so far?. Accountancy Business and the Public Interest, 19, 163-192.
Journal: Accountancy Business and the Public Interest 
Abstract: This article presents a comprehensive review of academic research pertaining to audit failure. This literature review is based on auditing-related articles published in leading journals during the 1976-2019 period. We organize our review around three main groups, namely (a) proxy measures of audit failure, (b) causes of audit failure, and (c) effects of audit failure. We observe that the literature uses a variety of proxies to capture audit failure, such as auditors’ going concern opinions (GCOs), material misstatements, auditor communication, financial reporting quality, and perceptions. We find that there are three signals of audit failure: non-issuance of a GCO prior to a business failure, material misstatements in the last audited financial statements, and violation of the code issued by regulators. We find that audit failures reduce clients’ market value and the auditor’s ability to retain clients. There is also evidence that larger penalties for audit failure result in higher audit fees and overinvestment in audit effort and that increased liability decreases audit failure and reduces auditor shirking. A related objective of this paper is to shed light on audit failure by Big N and non-Big N auditors separately. We observe that the audit failure rate is lower for Big N auditors than for non-Big N auditors. Our findings have implications for government policies, regulators, auditors, investors, and academics.
Appears in Collections:Scholarly Publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
wku_schlrs_publcn_000106.pdf371.74 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Show full item record

Page view(s)

checked on Apr 2, 2023


checked on Apr 2, 2023

Google ScholarTM


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons